My Trading Bot Was Quietly Costing Me 7.8% a Year. It Took Claude to Notice.
Generated through Gemini
On April 7, 2025, somewhere near the bottom of the tariff crash, my trading bot sold three of its four positions. It wasn’t supposed to be trading that day. It wasn’t supposed to be trading that week. And, I didn’t find out for another eighteen months.
Two and a half years ago, I backtested Hybrid Asset Allocation (HAA) and liked what I saw: steady growth, small drawdowns, a strategy that quietly steps aside when the market turns ugly. So I put it live. Steady, it turned out, was a polite word for slow. From June 2024 to October 2026, my account compounded at 8.2% a year while SPY did 17.0%, and the drawdown protection I’d signed up for came in about 2 percentage points better than simply holding the index. I didn’t assume HAA was broken. I thought it was just sluggish, and that it would surge someday.
So I went looking: a stack of papers on tactical asset allocation, each promising a way to make strategies like HAA react faster or hold up better. The plan was simple. Test the best ideas, keep the winner.
The plan lasted about ten minutes.